quote:

Originally posted by Juan Paulino Transfered everything from Logic 9 to Garageband with no hassle. Switched to a different kick thanks tot he audio engine and some new pads and a new lead. Now i'm ready for breakdown. Behold, the power of Garageband!

not gone on that kick Juan....

___________________
hearthis
soundcloud
youtube

quote:

Originally posted by evo8 not gone on that kick Juan....

\

Should i slap a saturator on it?

___________________


Juan Paulino - Quantum Break (Original Mix) [Progressive Breaks]

quote:

Originally posted by vercetti Mix sounds good so far, the lead at 2:30 could be a touch louder for my taste. My track I'm struggling a bit with at the moment. Let me know what you think about the mix and everything else.

its ok, the mix isnt bad, its just a bit samey all along
i dont really like the piano stabs at the start of the bar

___________________
hearthis
soundcloud
youtube

quote:

Originally posted by Juan Paulino \ Should i slap a saturator on it?

I would just choose a different kick :-/

___________________
hearthis
soundcloud
youtube

quote:

Originally posted by evo8 I would just choose a different kick :-/

Crap, ima put more thump on it and post a clip.

___________________


Juan Paulino - Quantum Break (Original Mix) [Progressive Breaks]

quote:

Originally posted by Juan Paulino To each their own. Cubase has the most distorted playback engine ever, will try pro tools and see how that goes. The Garageband engine made me change my kick and i think it sounds better now.

Juan, I was powertrolling you;

There is absolutely no difference between "audio engines". In fact, garage band uses exact the same code to process audio as found in logic. You just moved your project from one "audio engine" to the same "audio engine". The difference you're hearing is either placebo, different FX routing or pan laws.

quote:

Originally posted by Juan Paulino Crap, ima put more thump on it and post a clip.

thats just imo - others may like it!

___________________
hearthis
soundcloud
youtube

quote:

Originally posted by DJ RANN Juan, I was powertrolling you; There is absolutely no difference between "audio engines". In fact, garage band uses exact the same code to process audio as found in logic. You just moved your project from one "audio engine" to the same "audio engine". The difference you're hearing is either placebo, different FX routing or pan laws.

So your saying i can get the same depth i hear from garageband in logic 9?

With my lynx hilo, treatment, and focal twins i hear a big difference.

___________________


Juan Paulino - Quantum Break (Original Mix) [Progressive Breaks]

2 tracks, one i uploaded last week but changed the kick to a better one
and one new one i did last week as well

___________________
hearthis
soundcloud
youtube

quote:

Originally posted by Juan Paulino So your saying i can get the same depth i hear from garageband in logic 9? With my lynx hilo, treatment, and focal twins i hear a big difference.

When they made garage band, they took the audio code from Logic and made a simpler sequencer.

If you really are hearing a difference (and not placebo) it comes from the panning law settings possibly being different, different FX routing, and possibly the built in stock EQ and compressor being lsightly different.

Other than that there is literally no difference. Garageband is a cut down version of logic.

quote:

Originally posted by Juan Paulino Cubase has the most distorted playback engine ever,

Erm

No

___________________
Soundcloud