|
|
|
|
DJ RANN
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2001
Location: Hollywood....
|
|
At work so on the shiitest ever free airline ear buds, but it sounds like a Violin.
|
|
Jun-25-2019 18:31
|
|
|
|
|
DJ RANN
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2001
Location: Hollywood....
|
|
Simple answer:
If you're asking that question, then you shouldn't be attempting mastering.
There's countless services that will master a track for pennies and frankly you're better off sending an unmastered track as a demo as stating it's not mastered.
You're also worrying too much about peak values and not RMS which again scream don't try to master.
Sorry, I know you want to have a go but I promise, Mastering is a dark art that takes tens of thousands of dollars of specialized equipment in perfectly tuned spaces run by people that have decades of experience.
I'm a fairly proficient mix engineer and have some decent credits. I wouldn't even attempt mastering - it;s a different discipline and can't be faked. You might as well slap ozone on the master.
|
|
Jun-26-2019 22:10
|
|
|
|
|
Hides in Shadow
Suspended User
Registered: Apr 2019
Location: In Deep Space
|
|
|
Jun-26-2019 22:51
|
|
|
|
|
Hides in Shadow
Suspended User
Registered: Apr 2019
Location: In Deep Space
|
|
|
Jun-26-2019 23:21
|
|
|
|
|
TranceLover007
DariusX
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Seattle, USA
|
|
|
Jun-26-2019 23:49
|
|
|
|
|
DJ RANN
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2001
Location: Hollywood....
|
|
Darek's link is a great starting place, here's another:
https://theproaudiofiles.com/video/...01-peak-vs-rms/
Again, and I don't mean to piss on the party, I love people trying new shit but if you don't know the difference between peak and rms, you are a world away from ever getting in to mastering. I mean like 10 years from this point, if you dedicated your life to it.
But there's another facet to this conversation:
You're trying to master already mastered tracks. Everything in a DJ set (for better or worse) has already been mastered on a track level. It doesn't need mastering and worse, you're taking mastered tracks either playing them from a vinyl (RIAA processing) or from a DAC if digital, putting through a mixer which is adding some for of gain staging if not inadvertent compression/clip control, then back through a DAC for recording.
That's a whole bunch of processing on already mastered tracks, that if you then add more mastering to, gets imprinted on the master.
The ideal is to really "get to tape" as clean as you can with as little distortion as possible.
More mastering is just adding more distortion, and it's simply not needed. Just get as clean a signal path as possible with as hot a signal as possible before clipping and that's the goal.
Otherwise your compressing, eqing, limiting, spatializing (etc) tracks that someone has already spent the painstaking task of doing, and you're actually changing the tracks as they were intended to be heard.
|
|
Jun-27-2019 00:47
|
|
|
|
|
Hides in Shadow
Suspended User
Registered: Apr 2019
Location: In Deep Space
|
|
|
Jun-27-2019 04:21
|
|
|
|
|
DJ RANN
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2001
Location: Hollywood....
|
|
quote: | Originally posted by Hides in Shadow
I enjoy doing it, cheers. |
And that, right there is the one answer that is correct. More power to you.
|
|
Jun-27-2019 22:17
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 17:56.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|