quote: | Originally posted by The Dark NINJA
Hell no, don't know how, never tried, don't want to. |
Good, glad to hear it. I don't really see then how they could have "completely changed" your mixing style? They are no different from any other decent jog wheel CDJ. The difference has to be psycological.
Same withe the DAC I'm afraid. Both the CDJ900 and 2000 have wolfson DAC's (albeit ever so slightly better models - we're talking a $10 chip instead of $7). Sitting one foot to the right or left will have more baring on what you perceive than the difference between thsoe units in terms of audio quality. And let's face it, you're probably testing it with badly mastered mp3's from beatport.
quote: | Originally posted by Adam420
I find the whole CDJ vs. vinyl debate doesn't apply to me because I use my TTs to play tracks I can only get on vinyl and my CDJs to play anything I can get digitally so I have a legitimate use for both. But if you don't buy or play records anymore I don't see a huge point in keeping the TTs.
|
I'm in exactly the same position; I'll never sell my decks as there would be no way for me to play any of my old or new vinyl. CDJ's are for digital material.
Having said that, the feel of vinyl and therefore using a DVS like Serato is another valid reason to keep the decks.
quote: | Originally posted by Adam420
ill keep them to my grave, when i think of it my decks and vinyl is the only thing of real value here, rest is plastic junk from asia.
|
Amen. My M5G's are now 6 years old and as crisp as the day I bought them. The CDJ I bought after that which has seen less use is already not quite as pristine. There's a reason a Technics weighs 14 kilos and will last 50 years. Quality.
|