TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- DJ Booth
-- Sony MDR-7506 Review
Pages (10): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 »


Posted by Zack Roth on Dec-19-2008 05:45:

thinking about picking up a pair. I am using the older model Technics headphones now, and really like them. I have owned the silver Sony's and the Pioneer 1000's as well, and to be honest, don't really prefer any of them over each other sound wise. I use them to play out, and they all do the trick. I like the simple design of the 7506, and if they're comfortbale, thats a plus too. Just a quick question, are these really $100? That seems on the cheap side for headphones...


Posted by Freak on Dec-19-2008 13:01:

quote:
Originally posted by zizack
Just a quick question, are these really $100? That seems on the cheap side for headphones...


Yes
Its because they are aimed at professionals - not fashion victims paying over the odds for crap


Posted by Vinyljunkie09 on Dec-23-2008 01:37:

Have had these for a few years now best headphones i have ever used.


Posted by spdandpwr on Dec-23-2008 02:31:

what about the Sony MDR7505? i like the fact that they are smaller and lighter weight...you think they are worthwhile?


Posted by ReclusNdangrmnt on Dec-29-2008 01:19:

Just got me a pair of these, for about $95.

Hopefully they live up to the hype, as they should.


Posted by ReclusNdangrmnt on Dec-31-2008 09:05:

And they are WIN.

Has just the right amount of crunch, and they're quite comfortable...

Only gripe I have is a non-removable cord, but the quality, it is there.


Posted by SBK on Jan-13-2009 16:46:

Great cans, comfortable as f*ck and very crisp sounding. You really have to give them some time because at first they seems to have to much HIGH's. After 2 months Im in love with them and my backup technics rp-dj1210 (good hphones too) sounds muddy to me now

Cheers


Posted by Tony Morello on Jan-22-2009 19:15:

so i got drunk and lost my cans at a party (don't ask)

sucks cause they were just getting broken in too, now trying to break in my new replacements

been leaving them running with music going through them while at i'm gone to work to speed it up


Posted by Rikard on Jan-22-2009 19:46:

How long do you recon it took your old pair to get broken in?


Posted by Lunar Phase 7 on Jan-22-2009 19:46:

Honestly, once I got over the novelty that I had a pair of headphone BT, Sasha, Howells, etc... used I have never been so dissapointed.

£120 quid not well spent.


Posted by epdarks on Jan-22-2009 20:05:

quote:
Originally posted by Lunar Phase 7
Honestly, once I got over the novelty that I had a pair of headphone BT, Sasha, Howells, etc... used I have never been so dissapointed.

£120 quid not well spent.


No shit? You should plug them into a receiver, turn the bass up a hair and they will really shine.


Posted by Lunar Phase 7 on Jan-22-2009 20:58:

I have a Denon reciever. And they still suck shit.

My Sennheiser HD580's on the other hand rock so much.

Everything just sounds so fucking crisp and clean. My production translate so well from them too. Obviously though they are openback so useless for djing. But otherwise they kick serious, serious ass.


Posted by Freak on Jan-23-2009 15:22:

quote:
Originally posted by Lunar Phase 7
Honestly, once I got over the novelty that I had a pair of headphone BT, Sasha, Howells, etc... used I have never been so dissapointed.

£120 quid not well spent.


You paid £120 for them?

Even a 5 minute search you could have got them for half that delivered to the uk...

I conclude you must have ears made of cheese.


Posted by Tony Morello on Jan-23-2009 18:16:

quote:
Originally posted by Freak
You paid £120 for them?

Even a 5 minute search you could have got them for half that delivered to the uk...

I conclude you must have ears made of cheese.


+1

mine were only $130 CDN


Posted by Lunar Phase 7 on Jan-25-2009 01:55:

quote:
Originally posted by Freak
You paid £120 for them?

Even a 5 minute search you could have got them for half that delivered to the uk...

I conclude you must have ears made of cheese.


I didn't go for the V6's mate, and I didnt wanna get fucked on import tax.

£120 is pretty much retail price in the Uk, so suck my dong.


Posted by Allied Nations on Jan-25-2009 18:56:

even with import tax you could have gotten the v506 for well under 120 quid


Posted by Lunar Phase 7 on Jan-26-2009 03:21:

Well I won't lie, this has pissed me off. I found my email I got and I paid £105 including postage, so fuck knows where 120 came from.

And honestly, even if I paid half that, I still think they suck bollocks.

How they came to be so popular is anyones guess. Sennheiser beat them in every bloody direction.

Credit where credit is due though, replaceable parts is cool, and I love the way they look.


Posted by Yohan on Jan-26-2009 05:52:

quote:
Originally posted by Lunar Phase 7
How they came to be so popular is anyones guess.
a lot of DJs, incl some really famous ones, must have shitty sense of hearing


Posted by Lunar Phase 7 on Jan-28-2009 19:12:

quote:
Originally posted by Yohan
a lot of DJs, incl some really famous ones, must have shitty sense of hearing


Clearly since they ALL used the v700's which get slated to fuck on here, or worse those shite ass Pioneers.

I aint disputing that the 7506's are good, but they are far from what everyone makes out.

Wise up peoples.


Posted by epdarks on Jan-28-2009 22:29:

There are 2 ends of sound reproduction... detail on one end and musicality on the other end. The Sonys are obviously on the detail end of the spectrum. Accuracy over all else. If you're looking for a headphone for casual listening they are not that great. If you want to hear exactly how your mix sounds then IMO, for the money, there isn't a better buy out there.


Posted by Tony Morello on Jan-29-2009 02:35:

quote:
Originally posted by epdarks
There are 2 ends of sound reproduction... detail on one end and musicality on the other end. The Sonys are obviously on the detail end of the spectrum. Accuracy over all else. If you're looking for a headphone for casual listening they are not that great. If you want to hear exactly how your mix sounds then IMO, for the money, there isn't a better buy out there.


+1

they're made for studio use, they're accurate, kinda like reference monitors (not studio monitors) for your ears

they're flatter than most cans so you can hear what really is going on


Posted by Waterproofpaper on Jan-29-2009 03:09:

The 7506 and v6 are more flat/bright compared to other headphones. Some people just dont like the sound of it. My friend swears by the technics, but hates the sony. He says he likes full sound, but the technics i feel are a little tinny and muddy. His cans were kinda messed up in terms of the headband, but i dont think the sound was affected.

The midrange on the 7506 are great, but the highs are a little high.


Posted by Lunar Phase 7 on Jan-29-2009 15:38:

quote:
Originally posted by Tony Morello
+1

they're made for studio use, they're accurate, kinda like reference monitors (not studio monitors) for your ears

they're flatter than most cans so you can hear what really is going on


Honestly, I don't think they are accurate, at all.

As mentioned they are very bright, and I feel they are muddy on the low end.

My opinion of course. As stated a lot swear by them. Listening to Jaytech's album on them now, I think they fatigue your ears quickly.

I've really tried to love theses cans, but can't.


Posted by Waterproofpaper on Jan-29-2009 16:24:

I dont think they are muddy, just lacking in bass. I think the reason why everyone likes them so much is that they usually beatmatch with the mid and high range. I guess thats why i like them so much.


Posted by Tony Morello on Jan-29-2009 23:34:

they've been standard in the recording and radio industries for over 20 years now

so obviously they're doing something right

different strokes for different folks


Pages (10): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.